Big boxes are the result of competition and capitalism, and are here to stay. However, the isolation they create can be changed. Their development often takes an environment, flattens it, and paves over top. Then they place a massive structure on the site. The building often stands alone and detracts from any connection to pedestrians or the community. The massive interior open space is often void of dynamics and offers little interest to the customer. Our society is moving towards urbanization and creating denser micro-urban and lifestyle centers because people respond positively to them.
This thesis studies the ways that big box stores can be adapted to new urbanized markets, and how they can better interact within this context in a more engaging manner.
The thesis will suggest a new direction for big boxes, moving towards dynamic architecture and dynamic spaces. The new building shape will simultaneously create positive/negative and interior/exterior spaces both in plan and section. This proposal creates an architectural language and set of guidelines that other retailers can follow.
History of the Big Box
Future of the Big Box
Thesis by Hallie Futterman
PA: Margarita McGrath
SA: Heiner Schnoedt
Very impressive Hallie. A great way to view your thesis in process.
By: Evan Futterman on November 15, 2008
at 1:15 pm